GoodLifeBottles - 728x90

Travel and transport

India: Old vehicles ordered off streets to cut pollution

August 3, 2009

More than 60,000 ageing vehicles, from autorickshaws to taxis, were ordered off the streets of Kolkata over the weekend in an attempt to ease the city’s chronic air pollution. Kolkata’s high court had given owners of commercial vehicles older than 15 years a one-year deadline that ended on Saturday. “This is a green-letter day for the city. At last, it is being enforced,” said Subhas Dutta, an environmental activist whose legal battle against the city’s polluters brought about the court order last year. The government is also encouraging new autorickshaws and taxis to use compressed natural gas as fuel.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Read the full article →

The all-new Toyota Prius – silence of the lanes

July 31, 2009

Green cars have been branded overpriced, sluggish and ugly. Today, the most famous eco-car, the Toyota Prius, enters its third generation. Will the cleaner hybrid tempt buyers? Novelist Toby Litt took a test drive

I drove it down to Brighton, because it seemed a very Brighton sort of car – a hybrid vehicle for a transition town. I was expecting it to receive admiration, affirmation, perhaps even sly congratulation. But did it get envying sideways looks from cyclists? Thumbs up from Green activists? Tranced out nods from dog-on-string trustafarians?

No, not really. In fact, it was much better at passing unnoticed, particularly at passing unheard. When running only on its self-recharging battery, the thing is virtually soundless. (I usually drive a P-reg Audi A4, the cassette-player in which – when rewinding – is louder than the Prius.)

And so, while trailing a bearded, grey-haired man for about a minute down one of Brighton’s narrow lanes – him in the middle of the road and blithely unaware of the 5-door hatchback breathing down his neck – I had a realisation: the Prius might just be the best car ever for playing What’s the Time, Mr Wolf?

Once I realised this, there was a great temptation to spend the next half-hour sneaking up on crusties and giving them a friendly bump in the tattooed calves. But this would, of course, be foolish, dangerous and, most of all mischievous. And there’s not a smidgeon of any of these qualities about the Prius. It’s sensible, safe and – you might almost say – puritanical. This is a car that doesn’t just go, it also makes a stand. Driving it made me feel slightly chastened, as if I had my old RE teacher in the back seat.

Over and above a fuel-saving “Eco Mode”, you can put the Prius into EV (Electric Vehicle) Mode, where it stops being hybrid and runs entirely on its battery. This only lasts for a couple of miles before it reverts to mere Eco, but if you do anything even mildly aggressive – get up to entry velocity on a busy roundabout, say – the display will, more in sadness than anger, tell you” “EV Mode has been turned off due to excessive speed.”

I was almost surprised it didn’t follow this up with, “Hey, compadre, why don’t you just take a chill pill?” When I first turned the radio on, it had been set to Smooth FM. The advice sheet on “better driving” in the glove compartment perplexingly but characteristically read: “When driving at high speed, drive at a moderate and constant speed.” Okay, I get the point.

But it is this very moderation that is the Prius’s unique selling point. The car gently forces you to drive in an environmentally responsible way, and that means you don’t have to feel so guilty about the fact you are transporting yourself to buy a pack of decaf tea from Tesco’s in three tonnes of hi-tech metal. And products like this, ones we buy knowing they will gently force us to mend our ecocidal ways, are being marketed as the future – the future that tries to preserve the future of the future.

Although its looks are distinctive (a bit like a snowglobe-on-wheels that’s been semi-flattened, aerodynamicised and had an aerofoil added on the back), the Toyota Prius isn’t as much a statement here as in the US.

There, the “Pious Prius” has become a symbol of white-collar eco-smugness. You can join the Facebook group “I hate the Toyota Prius, and the liberal tree-huggers that drive them!” You can laugh at parody advertisements – one of which shows a man dragging a bagged up, weighed down corpse from the car’s trunk towards a lake above the slogan, “Well, at least he drives a Prius.” In California, it seems, you can attack them with rocks or by ramming them with less fuel-efficient cars, with impunity.

All of which seems to show how threatened some people feel by anything that appears unthreatening.

With more than 1m units sold, the Prius really is silently creeping up on American – and world – car culture.

It is, whisper it, a very sensible vehicle. A lot of intelligence has gone into its design. For example, the mph and SatNav arrows are displayed, by reflection, in the lower part of the driver’s side windscreen – in plain view but not obtrusive. The question it poses, though, is whether sensible, unobtrusive, intelligent measures can save us as we plunge down the steep slope the other side of peak oil. As for me, I’ve seen the future, and it walks.

• Blog: What Prius geeks think of the new model

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Read the full article →

How to be a green school

July 28, 2009

Teachers and students want to do good things for the environment, but sometimes they can’t see the wood for the trees. Zac Goldsmith sets out five things all schools can do

It’s a worrying fact that around 400,000 British children are on behavioural drugs such as Ritalin. Some, no doubt, need the treatment, but the sheer number of children taking these drugs suggests that in our society, childhood itself has come to be seen as a disease.

Children spend an average of 13.9 hours a week in front of their televisions, and six hours in front of their computers. It can’t be healthy. According to Unicef, British children are the unhappiest in Europe, despite unprecedented material wealth.

There are many reasons for this, but one, surely, is the fact that children have become increasingly insulated from the natural world. We’ve all heard of the ­surveys revealing that teenagers think cows lay eggs, and others where children can identify more brand logos than trees, by a staggering margin.

My view is that children will form a significant part of the green fightback. They instinctively understand the value of the environment. Ask any 10-year-old if Google – at its height – was really worth more than the Amazon rainforest, and they’d laugh.

But if the current crop of children is to emerge as a generation that cherishes the environment, they need to understand it, connect with it and love it. That goal must form part of the school experience. Schools collectively are huge energy consumers, producers of waste, and consumers of resources. What can they do?

1 Good food

One thing we all do is eat and so of all the levers for change, food is the most far reaching. Even a small change in the way we eat has huge implications – in schools, that is particularly so. The government spends approximately £2bn each year on food for schools, hospitals and prisons. Imagine the impact if instead of buying the cheapest junk on the world’s markets, that money was invested in local, sustainable produce?

The benefits would be huge. We’d see money flowing into our collapsing rural economy. We’d see a significant reduction in the amount of oil used to ship and fly food around the world. We’d actively reduce our dependence on a global food system that is ravaging the world’s breadbaskets. And of course, we’d see the market flooded with good quality sustainable food. With levels of obesity, diabetes and coronary heart disease increasing, and with growing evidence linking diet with mental health, crime and antisocial behaviour, that’s no bad thing.

We’re failing nationally. But there are some exciting local examples, for instance, in Merton, south London, where parents set themselves key goals: to win funding for a working kitchen in every school and to improve the quality of ingredients and cooking standards. It was ambitious, and no one knew if it would work. But it did. Led by the formidable Jackie Schneider, they pressurised the council to put aside £450,000 to refurbish primary school kitchens and allow them to produce fresh food on site. They also set up a twinning scheme with a nearby farm. Inspired by their success, I helped set up a similar campaign for Richmond and Kingston, called School Food Matters. The group is already ­making huge progress.

2 Cooking and growing

It’s not just the quality of the food. Children should also know about preparing it, and growing it. Growing food – as a process – has a clear value. Catherine Sneed, a counsellor in San Francisco’s county jail, noticed early on in her career that the same people kept returning to prison. Inspired by The Grapes of Wrath, a novel in which connectedness to the land binds families together, she set up a small prison garden. Inmates loved it, and the project flourished. The food they grow feeds hundreds of low-income families in the area, and inmates who take part in the project are a staggering 25% less likely to return to jail than those who don’t.

If growing food is therapeutic for California’s prisoners, there is every reason to believe it will be good for all of us. All schools should teach children basic cooking skills. Every school should be able to buy sustainable, good quality food wherever possible from local sources. Every school should include food growing in the curriculum. For some, that will mean twinning with willing farms. For others, it will mean literally building their own small farms.

3 The school run

Anyone driving through London after the school term ends will notice immediately how much easier it is to get around. The school run contributes massively to ­congestion. There are various schemes set up to combat this, not least the walk to school movement, whose annual walk-to-school month has inspired children and parents to promote healthier living and conserve the environment. But we need more, and parents should add their own pressure to calls for a dedicated school bus scheme.

In the US, yellow school buses represent the largest mass transit system in the country. About 450,000 of them take more than 25 million children to and from school. Each school bus takes between 30 to 60 cars off of the road during rush hour times. The leading US school bus manufacturer, IC Bus, is now producing the nation’s only line of hybrid school buses, which improve fuel efficiency by up to 70%. Each hybrid school bus is estimated to save $3,000 (£1,820) and 800 gallons of fuel annually. Our roads and our environment – not to mention commuters – are crying out for such a scheme to be introduced across the UK.

4 Energy savings

If schools successfully implement energy reduction measures, most can save as much as 10% on utility bills – water and heating – which, even for a small primary school, can run to £30,000 a year. With decreasing budgets and increasing costs, this is money they need: UK schools spend approximately £450m on energy each year, three times as much as they do on books, about 3.5% of their budgets.

It’s a challenge that needs to be met, and it can be incorporated into the classroom. In many schools, children are already taught about the smaller measures, like turning off the lights at the end of lessons. Beyond that, children can help calculate the school’s energy usage, and identify ways to cut it. They can use a school neutral carbon calculator (www.earthteam.net/GWCampaign/calculate.html) to help calculate their “carbon footprint” and understand how their school can reduce its emissions.

Parents, teachers and children can also lobby their local authority to champion the purchase of renewable power through their joint buying consortia. If it refuses, they can opt out of the contract and buy their power independently.

5 Waste

In the UK we generate enough waste every hour to fill the Albert Hall. At a time when pressure on the world’s resources has never been greater, we have to find a way to be more efficient. There’s a lot that schools can do.

As a start, they can better understand the issue, and following that, they can incorporate waste reduction in the school, and hopefully in their own homes.

Of all the waste we generate, plastic bags are perhaps the greatest symbol of our throwaway society. They are used, then forgotten, and they leave a terrible legacy. The figures are shocking. Each year 13bn bags are used and thrown away in the UK. Each bag will be used for an average of 20 minutes, and, once discarded, will take up to 1,000 years to decompose. About 200m will litter the countryside. Others find their way into the seas, where they are mistaken for food and kill up to 100,000 marine mammals each year, as well as countless birds.

Many countries have taken the initiative to ban or phase out bags, including China, South Africa, India and Kenya. In the UK, we’re miles behind, but there are some good local examples. The campaign in Richmond borough is being spearheaded by the schools themselves.

I had the huge pleasure of walking with a class of bright, 11-year-old children – unannounced – to a Tesco store in Kew. The children demanded to see the manager, and despite initial reluctance, were able to pose a series of hard-hitting and brilliant questions about packaging and plastic bags. They now fully intend to take the same questions to the chairman, Sir Terry Leahy, in Tesco headquarters.

None of these ideas is revolutionary, but all will make a difference – and together they will make a real difference. They are just a few ideas on what children and parents can do to green our schools, and help ensure that the next generation has the appetite, understanding and knowledge to deal with the environmental crisis we face.

Zac Goldsmith, former editor of the Ecologist magazine, is the Conservative parliamentary candidate for Richmond and North Kingston. His book, The Constant Economy, will be published in September by Atlantic Books

www.eco-schools.org.uk

www.schoolfoodmatters.com

www.mertonparents.co.uk

www.greeneruponthames.org

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Read the full article →

Prius takes a ride to the US aboard solar-powered container ship

July 20, 2009

Green freighter makes maiden Japan-US voyage to deliver Toyota hybrids. From BusinessGreen.com, part of the Guardian Environment Network

As the manufacturer of the world’s most famous hybrid car, it seems only fitting that Toyota has now begun shipping its Prius cars to the US using a container ship that could also qualify as a hybrid.

The Auriga Leader, the world’s first freighter to be partly powered using solar energy, has made its maiden voyage to the US from Japan, arriving at California’s Port of Long Beach earlier this month with a consignment of Prius cars and other Toyota vehicles.

Launched in December, the ship is equipped with 328 solar panels on its car carrier which can generate up to 40kW of energy.

The Auriga Leader’s solar array provides a supplementary source of clean energy to the ship, helping to reduce the load on its auxiliary engines. They also serve a double duty by helping to protect the vehicles from salt water, wind pressure and vibrations while at sea.

The freighter is a joint project from Japanese companies Nippon Yusen Kaisha and Nippon Oil Corp – which invested $1.68m (£1m) in the solar panel system – and is contracted exclusively to Toyota.

The Japanese automaker will use the Auriga Leader, which can carry up to 6,400 vehicles, to make bi-weekly trips between Japan and California.

In addition to having a green mode of overseas delivery, most Prius cars are produced in a solar-powered factory in Tsutsumi, located in central Japan. Its rooftop array produces 2MW of electricity per hour, meeting about half the plant’s energy requirements.

The latest version of the iconic car, which was launched in Japan in May and is expected in the UK this summer, also features a rooftop solar panel designed to provide power for the car’s cooling systems.

• This article was shared by our content partner BusinessGreen.com, part of the Guardian Environment Network

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Read the full article →

Government unveils sweeping plans for low-carbon economy

July 15, 2009

The low-carbon transition plan covers all sectors, from home insulation and generating power, to electric cars and high-speed trains

The government has unveiled detailed plans for transforming the UK to a low-carbon economy and meeting its targets for reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

The measures, which touch on all aspects of life, from home insulation and power generation to electric cars and high-speed trains, are designed to achieve emissions cuts of 34% by 2020 compared with 1990 levels.

Under the plans, which are projected to create 1.2m “green jobs”, every government department will be required to meet a carbon budget alongside its financial budget. The announcement is the first time the government has laid out in detail where the carbon axe will fall and how much each department will be expected to cut.

Miliband warned, however, that domestic energy prices would rise in 2020 to pay for some of the required changes. He hoped this would be offset with energy efficiency savings in 7m homes and financial help for the poorest consumers.

“The proposals published today are the first time we have set out a comprehensive plan for carbon across every sector – energy, homes, transport, agriculture and business,” said Miliband. “Our transition plan is a route map to 2020. It strengthens our energy security, it seeks to be fair in the decisions we make, above all it rises to the moral challenge of climate change.”

In the government’s white paper on energy and climate, called the UK Low Carbon Transition Plan and published today, half of the proposed carbon cuts to 2020 would come from changes to the power sector, 15% from making homes more efficient, 10% from workplace improvements, 20% from changing how we travel and 5% from agriculture and land use.

This means that 40% of UK electricity by 2020 will come from low-carbon sources including renewables, nuclear and clean coal. The white paper also launches consultation on the details of the government’s feed-in tariff, re-named the “clean energy cash-back” scheme, which will pay people and businesses a premium for generating low-carbon electricity. A similar scheme for renewable heat will follow in April 2011.

The white paper details plans for a “pay as you save” scheme for homeowners to receive loans to insulate their homes, with money repaid by savings in energy costs.

Philip Sellwood, chief executive of the Energy Saving Trust welcomed the scheme. “People tell us that the biggest barrier that stops them from making their homes more energy efficient is the need to find money to pay for the up-front costs. Our research shows that householders are more likely to make larger investments, including micro-generation and solid-wall insulation, if the costs can be spread through the savings they make on their energy bills.”

Other measures in the white paper and the industrial and transport strategies, also published today, include:

• Up to £6m to start development of a “smart grid”, including a policy road map next year.

• Launch of the new Office for Renewable Energy Deployment in the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) to speed up the growth of renewables in the UK.

• DECC to take direct responsibility from Ofgem for establishing a new grid access regime within 12 months.

• Up to £180m would be made available to promote wind and tidal power – this includes setting up a low-carbon economic area in the south-west to promote marine technologies and money for up to 3,000 wind turbines off the UK’s shores by 2020.

• £15m to establish a Nuclear Advanced Manufacturing Research Centre that will develop the next generation of nuclear power infrastructure.

• £10 million will go to improving infrastructure for charging electric vehicles.

• Challenging 15 villages, towns or cities to be test-beds for piloting future green initiatives.

The shadow energy secretary Greg Clark welcomed the white paper, which he said was familiar since much of it borrowed from Conservative policy. “Over 12 years we have had 15 energy ministers, but no energy policy. Does [Miliband] recognise that while other countries have spent the last decade diversifying their supplies of energy, Britain has become even more dependent on imported fossil fuels – threatening our energy security, our economic competitiveness, and our climate change objectives?”

He added: “The secretary of state stands in a position of great moment. He must decide whether he breaks with the past and implements rigorously the measures that both he and I know are needed, or whether the next six months will prove, like the last 12 years, to have been a time of opportunity lost.”

John Sauven, executive director of Greenpeace, said: “If this plan becomes a reality, it will create hundreds of thousands of green jobs and make Britain a safer and more prosperous country. This will be good for the British economy and, in the long-run, save householders money as we reduce our dependence on foreign oil and gas. Ed Miliband appears to be winning important battles in Whitehall. But it’s crucial that these plans now get full cross-party support and more backing from the chancellor. The renewable energy industry is too important to become a political football and this strategy for green jobs deserves more than the current paltry sums being offered by the Treasury.”

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Read the full article →

UK energy secretary to launch major renewables expansion to cut emissions

July 15, 2009

Forty per cent of electricity will come from low carbon sources of renewables, nuclear and clean coal by the end of the next decade, says energy secretary

Tackling climate change will require “comprehensive changes” in the UK’s economy and society, energy secretary Ed Miliband said today as he unveiled plans to slash emissions from power, transport, agriculture and industry.

Laying out how the UK would meet its legally binding targets to cut emissions by 34% by 2020, he said 40% of electricity would come from low carbon sources including renewables, nuclear and clean coal by the end of the next decade.

Ministers were today publishing measures on how they propose to shift the UK to a low carbon economy, including a green transport strategy, energy efficiency measures and attempts to boost the number of environmental industry jobs.

Miliband told MPs that seven million homes would be given pay-as-you-save energy makeovers, with grants which would paid back through savings in energy bills.

And 1.5m households would be supported to produce their own clean energy through a “feed-in tariffs” system which will pay them for the electricity they generate, he said.

Ministers will also set out measures on low-carbon transport and for ensuring that the UK benefits from thousands of potential “green jobs” as they publish the UK low carbon transition plan white paper.

But the government has come under fire for the impact of increasing renewables in the energy mix could have on people’s fuel bills in the future.

The UK has committed to the world’s first legally binding “carbon budgets”, which require a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions of 34% by 2020 and at least 80% by 2050, and a EU target of meeting 15% of all energy needs from renewables by 2020.

Measures to meet the goals will cover a wide range of sectors including power, transport, homes, workplaces and agriculture.

Among the schemes to reduce climate emissions to be launched today will be a “pay as you save” programme for homeowners to receive loans to insulate their homes, with the money repaid from savings on energy bills.

And people who install small-scale renewables such as solar panels or wind turbines will be paid, through a “feed-in tariffs” programme, for the electricity they generate.

There are also plans to increase large-scale renewable energy and in particular wind — with proposals for some 4,000 new onshore turbines and a further 3,000 offshore.

The government’s consultation on renewable energy last year estimated meeting targets to increase green power could lead to a rise in fuel bills of almost £230 a year by the end of the next decade.

But officials say revised estimates will show the costs of a switch to green energy will be lower than that.

Ahead of the publication of a renewable energy strategy launched alongside the white paper today, the energy and climate change secretary, Ed Miliband, warned there would be “upward pressures” on prices whatever the energy mix.

Miliband said today’s document set out a “route map” towards achieving the 2020 targets for CO2 cuts, which he said could generate 400,000 new “green” jobs by 2015.

He acknowledged that low-carbon energy would be more expensive for consumers, but pointed out that high-carbon fuels like coal and gas could also be expected to get more expensive because of increased demand from China and India.

He told BBC Radio 4′s Today programme: “What we are trying to do is to set out not simply targets for 2020 – which have been set – but a route map to get there: How we are going to take the carbon dioxide out of the way we travel, our homes and the way we provide energy.”

Continuing on the high-carbon route would force the UK to import more fossil fuels, leaving the country exposed to oil price fluctuations and conflict elsewhere in the world, while there would also be costs in shifting to a low-carbon energy mix, he said.

The Tories accused ministers of failing to address the looming energy crunch over the past 12 years, leading to a “vacuum where there should have been an energy policy”.

Householders faced rising bills as the UK became increasingly reliant on costly imported gas, because it had one of the lowest renewable sectors in Europe and some of the least energy efficient buildings, shadow energy secretary Greg Clark warned.

“The scramble to catch up with the rest of Europe will now be more costly than if action to reduce reliance on oil and gas had been taken in a planned way over the last ten years,” he said.

Environmentalists remain concerned about the ambition of the white paper, which lays out how the UK will meet the targets for emissions cuts recommended by the Committe on Climate Change and made legally binding by the Climate Change Act.

While the committee, set up to advise ministers on cutting emissions, recommended almost entirely de-carbonising the electricity sector by 2030, green campaigners fear the government will not go nearly as far as that.

Alongside renewables, new nuclear build and new coal fired power stations – as long as a proportion of any new plant is fitted with technology to capture and permanently store carbon emissions – will form part of the energy mix in the future.

Greenpeace executive director John Sauven said: “The government must prioritise renewable energy and energy efficiency over everything else in the sector. If they do this, Britain could lead the fight against climate change, whilst providing hundreds of thousands of jobs. Anything less would be a failure.

Other environmental campaigners said they were concerned that sufficient cuts would not be made in the UK, but “offset” by paying for reductions abroad.

One of the most controversial elements of plans to boost renewables in the UK are proposals for large-scale projects to harness the tidal power of the Severn estuary.

The government is expected to confirm a shortlist of five schemes for the Severn today, including proposals for multi-billion pound 10-mile barrage across the estuary.

As part of today’s announcement the government will also be publishing a transport carbon-reduction strategy.

The government has already announced several initiatives, including moves to make electric cars more affordable by providing help worth £2,000 to £5,000 towards buying the first electric and plug in hybrid cars when they hit the showrooms from 2011.

Last month the government announced eight new low-carbon vehicle projects were being launched with some of the schemes involving members of the public being invited to test out electric cars.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Read the full article →